The “Grant or Peer Review” is the objective process used by funding organizations to assess the efficacy and potential benefit of the services, programs or initiatives being proposed by applicants. Grant reviews are a critical component of the funding process and are designed to choose the best programs for funding out of a competitive group.
Types of Grant Reviews
Types of Grant Reviews Reviewer Registry provides support to a variety of grant review models used by our clients:
- Remote Grant Review – All reviews are conducted online, with participants needing internet access. Training and discussions occur via web platforms or teleconferences.
- Onsite Grant Review – SMEs meet in person to review and evaluate grant applications.
- Hybrid Grant Review – A two-stage process: initial scoring is done independently, followed by in-person panel review for final evaluation.
Grant Reviewer Role
Reviewers are professionals and subject matter experts selected for their expertise to evaluate grant applications based on criteria outlined in a FOA or NOFA. They must thoroughly review applications, contribute to discussions, and provide accurate evaluations.
Reviewers typically commit 1–2 weeks, confirm eligibility, and disclose any conflicts of interest. Non-agency participants may receive an honorarium, as determined by the funding entity.
Benefits
Reviewing grant applications will help you gain experience in preparing quality grant applications and will provide you with an overview of the award process. You will have opportunities to network with professional peers and Federal officials. The knowledge you obtain can add to your own professional development and goals.